ACLU says Johnny Depp owes it $86k in legal fees

Johnny Depp’s authorized woes seem to be to have no close in sight — with the actor now squaring off with the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) around $86,000 in authorized charges.

Right after a bombshell trial, a Virginia jury awarded Depp $10.35 million in damages, finding that his ex-wife Amber Read defamed him in a Washington Put up op-ed ghostwritten by the ACLU.

The non-income was subpoenaed in the scenario, and a New York state choose requested the charity to convert about documents and develop witnesses, including Main Working Officer Terence Dougherty for a deposition.

The ACLU is now suing Depp for $86,253.26 in legal service fees in Manhattan Supreme Court— the total the charity states it price tag to comply with the subpoenas.

JOHNNY DEPP v. AMBER Listened to JUROR SPEAKS OUT FOR 1st TIME

This incorporated examining around 7,500 files and developing 3 witnesses, including Dougherty, for prolonged depositions, according to the ACLU. 

The piece, which was penned by an ACLU law firm, did not discover Depp by name but said he experienced abused her.

Although the ACLU was not a social gathering to Depp’s defamation match from Read, the charity’s purpose in drafting and pitching the op-ed to the Washington Publish was central to the litigation. Read asked for that the piece’s publication day coincide with the launch of her movie “Aquaman.”

JOHNNY DEPP VERDICT: ACTOR WINS DEFAMATION Case Towards EX-Spouse AMBER Heard

The charity’s tally integrated the charge of making a “privilege log” that recognized 160 things that were being withheld owing to a “frequent fascination privilege over communications” amongst ACLU legal professionals and Heard’s attorneys.

The actor’s legal workforce has accused the ACLU of “coordinating and aiding Ms. Read in litigating Mr. Depp’s defamation fit” then charging him for it, they wrote in court docket papers. 

Legal professionals for the “Pirates of the Caribbean” star termed the $86,000 sum “exorbitant and unreasonable” but agreed to pay back $1,096.67 for 3rd-party details web hosting service fees.

 In the most current movement filed June 14, the ACLU argued that Depp’s subpoenas ended up overly “wide and burdensome,” and the charity’s planning of a “privilege log” to comply with the discovery requires are beautifully acceptable.

AMBER Heard Suggests SHE Continue to Enjoys JOHNNY DEPP IN BLOCKBUSTER Interview

The ACLU came less than hearth all through the trial, with critics calling the charity complicit in Heard’s alleged deception. 

Just after Listened to pledged $3.5 million to the charity – 50 percent of her $7 million divorce settlement, the corporation named her an ambassador on women’s legal rights and gender-centered violence.

She later on claimed on a Dutch Tv set display that she had given absent her complete divorce payout as promised: 50 percent to the ACLU and the other half to the Children’s Clinic of Los Angeles.

Daughetry admitted in his deposition played for jurors that Heard had only specifically donated $350,000. The firm credited her with donating $1.3 million — the bulk of which came from her ex-boyfriend, tech billionaire Elon Musk.

Depp’s attorney, Ben Chew, argued in court docket that the ACLU helped Listened to coverup her bogus statements, expressing the charity “played a reprehensible role in this situation.”

It was also revealed for the duration of the demo that Read only coughed up $250,000 of the $3.5 million she pledged to the Children’s Medical center of Los Angeles.

A juror, who spoke anonymously to Excellent Early morning The united states, referred to as her fake declare she had created the donations a “fiasco.”

Click on Listed here TO GET THE FOX News App

“It’s a single matter, Your Honor, for her to stiff the ACLU,” Chew stated in courtroom. “It is fairly one more for her to are unsuccessful to honor her obligation to the Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles, with ill and dying young children, and that she failed to do as effectively.”

The ACLU was the moment viewed as a bastion of free speech — notably defending the right of neo-Nazis to rally in Illinois.