
The Regulation Culture need to continue being neutral, rational and good as a expert team and prevent any connection to politics, former Bar Affiliation chair Winnie Tam Wan-chi says.
Tam said she fears the likely downfall of the Law Culture would drag the Bar Association.
Tam, a senior counsel, told The Standard’s sister newspaper Sing Tao Every day in an exceptional job interview she is anxious that if authorities stop recognizing the Law Culture – as Chief Govt Carrie Lam Cheng Yuet-ngor has warned – the Bar Association will also be afflicted.
“As the Bar Association and Regulation Society are interdependent, I am not only voluntarily assisting the Regulation Society, but I am worried that the two the Bar Affiliation and the Regulation Modern society will be axed jointly. I do not want to see that going on,” she reported.
Tam reported she hopes the “Legislation Culture will cut its ties with politics and remain a neutral, rational and expert group.”
She reported all 16 Regulation Society council associates, its chairman and three vice chairmen really should not have any affiliation with political get-togethers.
Tam additional that the 11 candidates in tomorrow’s election to select 5 council members must declare to voters their close relationships with political events, or fears about them being affected by politics might occur.
To restore a public picture as a neutral, rational and neutral specialist system it will have to, Tam mentioned, aim on expert troubles and categorical its views on legal troubles as a reference to policymakers and the community.
“It truly is basically wholesome if [the Bar Association’s] objections to the SAR or central authorities are constructive responses from a qualified point of view, rather than out of some political motivations,” Tam stated.
As a bridge among the authorized sector and the govt, the Bar Association and the Regulation Modern society ought to categorical their viewpoints when essential, Tam claimed. “But they will have to harmony amongst diverse sights and stay away from sturdy expressions that will give the impact that the two bodies are turning into platforms for political sights.”
The election will replace the 20-solid governing council’s five longest-serving users.
Candidate Jonathan Ross from the “liberal camp” was barred from withdrawing since some proxy and mail-in votes have currently been acknowledged, mentioned chairwoman Melissa Kaye Pang. But Ross can resign if elected, she additional.
Ross explained he “essential to secure” his personal safety and that of his spouse and children right after currently being “intimidated for jogging in the election,” calling it a “shameful and unhappy day of Hong Kong.”
Pang explained the Legislation Modern society is dealing with Ross’ statements very seriously and has reported the scenario to police.
“There is no withdrawal mechanism in our regulations and polices Candidates can decide to resign as a council member immediately after becoming elected. A candidate’s intention to withdraw will not impact election techniques,” Pang said.
Police stated it has received a report that a 74-calendar year-outdated member of a culture allegedly received intimidating textual content messages and that the circumstance is detailed as a “request for police investigation.” No a person has been arrested so far.
Barrister Athena Kung Ching-yee questioned irrespective of whether Ross’ “withdrawal” was a tactic to attract sympathy votes.”
More Stories
What’s the Difference Between: A Lawyer, Solicitor, Advocate, Barrister, Counselor, and an Attorney?
A Brief on Various Senior Living Properties
Elder Care Laws – Can My Children Force Me to Live in a Nursing Home?